<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Android-ready Lenovo Ophone looks better than both the G1 and the iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/12/12/android-ready-lenovo-ophone-looks-better-than-both-the-g1-and-the-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/12/12/android-ready-lenovo-ophone-looks-better-than-both-the-g1-and-the-iphone/</link>
	<description>Wireless news, views and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:47:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/12/12/android-ready-lenovo-ophone-looks-better-than-both-the-g1-and-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-23741</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=8223#comment-23741</guid>
		<description>We own &lt;a href=&quot;http://OPHONE.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OPHONE.com&lt;/a&gt; (and are developing a phone originally referred to as &#039;OPHONE&#039;) and that has been plain for anyone to see. China Mobile, like many Chinese companies, forget to consider trademarks or IP, hence the many KIRF products from that side of the world. They will also have to contend with Apple who are not keen on any device with a letter before the word &#039;phone&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We own <a href="http://OPHONE.com" rel="nofollow">OPHONE.com</a> (and are developing a phone originally referred to as &#39;OPHONE&#39;) and that has been plain for anyone to see. China Mobile, like many Chinese companies, forget to consider trademarks or IP, hence the many KIRF products from that side of the world. They will also have to contend with Apple who are not keen on any device with a letter before the word &#39;phone&#39;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name</title>
		<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/12/12/android-ready-lenovo-ophone-looks-better-than-both-the-g1-and-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-22471</link>
		<dc:creator>Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=8223#comment-22471</guid>
		<description>@Ed&lt;br&gt;Nothing wrong there, Taiwan is also known as the Republic of CHINA&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I honestly don&#039;t see whats so interesting that a British company has trademarked the term &#039;OPhone&#039;. Sure, they might have trademarked it, but trademarks are limited to geographical regions if I&#039;m not mistaken? A British company is going to have a hard time suing Lenovo on using the term &#039;OPhone&#039;, especially when they don&#039;t have a local presence in China, where the term is being used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ed<br />Nothing wrong there, Taiwan is also known as the Republic of CHINA</p>
<p>I honestly don&#39;t see whats so interesting that a British company has trademarked the term &#39;OPhone&#39;. Sure, they might have trademarked it, but trademarks are limited to geographical regions if I&#39;m not mistaken? A British company is going to have a hard time suing Lenovo on using the term &#39;OPhone&#39;, especially when they don&#39;t have a local presence in China, where the term is being used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilinca</title>
		<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/12/12/android-ready-lenovo-ophone-looks-better-than-both-the-g1-and-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-21855</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilinca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=8223#comment-21855</guid>
		<description>Yeah, sorry for that, I was thinking about Acer, which is indeed based in Taiwan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve corrected the article, thanks for the comment :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, sorry for that, I was thinking about Acer, which is indeed based in Taiwan.</p>
<p>I&#39;ve corrected the article, thanks for the comment <img src='http://www.unwiredview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/12/12/android-ready-lenovo-ophone-looks-better-than-both-the-g1-and-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-21854</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 03:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=8223#comment-21854</guid>
		<description>Hello!!! EXCUSE ME??!! LENOVO IS A TAIWAN BASED COMPANY???!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!!! EXCUSE ME??!! LENOVO IS A TAIWAN BASED COMPANY???!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
