<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple plans to integrate iPhone Mapping and Calendar apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/01/13/apple-plans-to-integrate-calendar-and-navigation-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/01/13/apple-plans-to-integrate-calendar-and-navigation-apps/</link>
	<description>Wireless news, views and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:14:25 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JK Lassitter</title>
		<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/01/13/apple-plans-to-integrate-calendar-and-navigation-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-21401</link>
		<dc:creator>JK Lassitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=9367#comment-21401</guid>
		<description>I am an Apple fan and owner of Apple computers, but if the U.S. Patent Office does not REFUSE this patent, then they are more airheaded than this patent application.  This is the kind of patent nonsense that needs to be squelched because it is trying to patent THE OBVIOUS: integration of software applications is a natural, obvious, and generic evolutionary consequence of faster and more powerful micro-processors.  There is currently FAR TOO MUCH aggressive and foolish patenting nonsense going on among software developers and the U.S. Patent Office needs to squash it.  In fact, it should fine organizations that submit stupid and unnecessary patents because processing them takes up so much time and resources.  A copyright of the software organization and coding makes far more sense, and it doesn&#039;t stifle natural and OBVIOUS growth pathways that benefit the U.S. citizens with improved products.  Note to the U.S. Patent Office:  Wake Up! This patent application is folly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an Apple fan and owner of Apple computers, but if the U.S. Patent Office does not REFUSE this patent, then they are more airheaded than this patent application.  This is the kind of patent nonsense that needs to be squelched because it is trying to patent THE OBVIOUS: integration of software applications is a natural, obvious, and generic evolutionary consequence of faster and more powerful micro-processors.  There is currently FAR TOO MUCH aggressive and foolish patenting nonsense going on among software developers and the U.S. Patent Office needs to squash it.  In fact, it should fine organizations that submit stupid and unnecessary patents because processing them takes up so much time and resources.  A copyright of the software organization and coding makes far more sense, and it doesn&#39;t stifle natural and OBVIOUS growth pathways that benefit the U.S. citizens with improved products.  Note to the U.S. Patent Office:  Wake Up! This patent application is folly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
