<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T rejected Motorola Android phones for being &#8220;out of date&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/08/27/att-rejected-motorola-android-phones-for-being-out-of-date/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/08/27/att-rejected-motorola-android-phones-for-being-out-of-date/</link>
	<description>Wireless news, views and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: motozine</title>
		<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/08/27/att-rejected-motorola-android-phones-for-being-out-of-date/comment-page-1/#comment-25966</link>
		<dc:creator>motozine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=19582#comment-25966</guid>
		<description>Motorola Sholes will release around October 2009 to Verizon. Motorola Sholes will have name Motorola A855 Sholes. More detail to this link =&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://motorolazine.biz/index.php?topic=544.0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://motorolazine.biz/index.php?topic=544.0&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Motorola Sholes will release around October 2009 to Verizon. Motorola Sholes will have name Motorola A855 Sholes. More detail to this link =&gt; <a href="http://motorolazine.biz/index.php?topic=544.0" rel="nofollow">http://motorolazine.biz/index.php?topic=544.0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motozine</title>
		<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/08/27/att-rejected-motorola-android-phones-for-being-out-of-date/comment-page-1/#comment-23017</link>
		<dc:creator>motozine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=19582#comment-23017</guid>
		<description>Motorola Sholes will release around October 2009 to Verizon. Motorola Sholes will have name Motorola A855 Sholes. More detail to this link =&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://motorolazine.biz/index.php?topic=544.0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://motorolazine.biz/index.php?topic=544.0&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Motorola Sholes will release around October 2009 to Verizon. Motorola Sholes will have name Motorola A855 Sholes. More detail to this link =&gt; <a href="http://motorolazine.biz/index.php?topic=544.0" rel="nofollow">http://motorolazine.biz/index.php?topic=544.0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Staska</title>
		<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/08/27/att-rejected-motorola-android-phones-for-being-out-of-date/comment-page-1/#comment-22973</link>
		<dc:creator>Staska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=19582#comment-22973</guid>
		<description>Maybe. Also that comes from an estimate from a single analyst who heard&lt;br&gt;something from it&#039;s sources.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So we can believe it as much as we like. Especially about the reasons, if&lt;br&gt;AT&amp;T really rejected Motorola phones.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it might be because AT&amp;T ain&#039;t too happy  about Android overall.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There already were some rumors that it also rejected Android handset from&lt;br&gt;HTC &quot;due to technical issues&quot; , that every other network around the world&lt;br&gt;was happy to have.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The thing is, if Android gets popular, it will negate the main competitive&lt;br&gt;advantage AT&amp;T has now -iPhone exclusivity, and make it impossible to recoup&lt;br&gt;all the money it lost already subsidizing the thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe. Also that comes from an estimate from a single analyst who heard<br />something from it&#39;s sources.</p>
<p>So we can believe it as much as we like. Especially about the reasons, if<br />AT&#038;T really rejected Motorola phones.</p>
<p>I think it might be because AT&#038;T ain&#39;t too happy  about Android overall.</p>
<p>There already were some rumors that it also rejected Android handset from<br />HTC &#8220;due to technical issues&#8221; , that every other network around the world<br />was happy to have.</p>
<p>The thing is, if Android gets popular, it will negate the main competitive<br />advantage AT&#038;T has now -iPhone exclusivity, and make it impossible to recoup<br />all the money it lost already subsidizing the thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Staska</title>
		<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/08/27/att-rejected-motorola-android-phones-for-being-out-of-date/comment-page-1/#comment-22972</link>
		<dc:creator>Staska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=19582#comment-22972</guid>
		<description>Maybe. Also that comes from an estimate from a single analyst who heard&lt;br&gt;something from it&#039;s sources.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So we can believe it as much as we like. Especially about the reasons, if&lt;br&gt;AT&amp;T really rejected Motorola phones.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it might be because AT&amp;T ain&#039;t too happy  about Android overall.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There already were some rumors that it also rejected Android handset from&lt;br&gt;HTC &quot;due to technical issues&quot; , that every other network around the world&lt;br&gt;was happy to have.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The thing is, if Android gets popular, it will negate the main competitive&lt;br&gt;advantage AT&amp;T has now -iPhone exclusivity, and make it impossible to recoup&lt;br&gt;all the money it lost already subsidizing the thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe. Also that comes from an estimate from a single analyst who heard<br />something from it&#39;s sources.</p>
<p>So we can believe it as much as we like. Especially about the reasons, if<br />AT&#038;T really rejected Motorola phones.</p>
<p>I think it might be because AT&#038;T ain&#39;t too happy  about Android overall.</p>
<p>There already were some rumors that it also rejected Android handset from<br />HTC &#8220;due to technical issues&#8221; , that every other network around the world<br />was happy to have.</p>
<p>The thing is, if Android gets popular, it will negate the main competitive<br />advantage AT&#038;T has now -iPhone exclusivity, and make it impossible to recoup<br />all the money it lost already subsidizing the thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bov</title>
		<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/08/27/att-rejected-motorola-android-phones-for-being-out-of-date/comment-page-1/#comment-22970</link>
		<dc:creator>Bov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=19582#comment-22970</guid>
		<description>I think this only applies to the Heron since the Sholes is in no way out of date compared to other phones. As a matter of fact, its spec&#039;ed better than the iPhone 3GS which is AT&amp;t&#039;s flagship phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this only applies to the Heron since the Sholes is in no way out of date compared to other phones. As a matter of fact, its spec&#39;ed better than the iPhone 3GS which is AT&#038;t&#39;s flagship phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c2499022.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com

Served from: www.unwiredview.com @ 2012-02-14 12:02:47 -->
