<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Mobile 7 already in testing, LG says it&#8217;s coming this year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2010/01/06/windows-mobile-7-already-in-testing-lg-says-its-coming-this-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2010/01/06/windows-mobile-7-already-in-testing-lg-says-its-coming-this-year/</link>
	<description>Wireless news, views and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Belkmeir</title>
		<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2010/01/06/windows-mobile-7-already-in-testing-lg-says-its-coming-this-year/comment-page-1/#comment-25870</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Belkmeir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=24580#comment-25870</guid>
		<description>If Windows Mobile 7 is already operating in test phones, as claimed, then why couldn&#039;t we see it at CES?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Surely, Ballmer could give us a little peak. Show us a feature or two, to prove it to the disbelievers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If they can&#039;t show us a glimpse, it makes me think it must be at a very early stage of development. Otherwise Ballmer would be singing it to the rooftops. I think it must be further behind in development than previously predicted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Windows Mobile 7 is already operating in test phones, as claimed, then why couldn&#39;t we see it at CES?</p>
<p>Surely, Ballmer could give us a little peak. Show us a feature or two, to prove it to the disbelievers.</p>
<p>If they can&#39;t show us a glimpse, it makes me think it must be at a very early stage of development. Otherwise Ballmer would be singing it to the rooftops. I think it must be further behind in development than previously predicted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Belkmeir</title>
		<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2010/01/06/windows-mobile-7-already-in-testing-lg-says-its-coming-this-year/comment-page-1/#comment-24223</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Belkmeir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=24580#comment-24223</guid>
		<description>If Windows Mobile 7 is already operating in test phones, as claimed, then why couldn&#039;t we see it at CES?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Surely, Ballmer could give us a little peak. Show us a feature or two, to prove it to the disbelievers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If they can&#039;t show us a glimpse, it makes me think it must be at a very early stage of development. Otherwise Ballmer would be singing it to the rooftops. I think it must be further behind in development than previously predicted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Windows Mobile 7 is already operating in test phones, as claimed, then why couldn&#39;t we see it at CES?</p>
<p>Surely, Ballmer could give us a little peak. Show us a feature or two, to prove it to the disbelievers.</p>
<p>If they can&#39;t show us a glimpse, it makes me think it must be at a very early stage of development. Otherwise Ballmer would be singing it to the rooftops. I think it must be further behind in development than previously predicted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c2499022.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com

Served from: www.unwiredview.com @ 2012-02-14 13:04:57 -->
