Comments on: Samsung files for “Vita OS” trademark – another mobile OS? http://www.unwiredview.com/2010/01/21/samsung-files-for-vita-os-trademark-another-mobile-os/ Wireless news, views and reviews Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:06:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: karlheinz_shreiber http://www.unwiredview.com/2010/01/21/samsung-files-for-vita-os-trademark-another-mobile-os/comment-page-1/#comment-26246 karlheinz_shreiber Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:30:18 +0000 http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=25298#comment-26246 That looks interesting but I guess that Samsung will hold on to BADA after all their publishing on their homepage (<a href="http://samsung.de/de/Privatkunden/Mobil/Mobiltelefone/type.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://samsung.de/de/Privatkunden/Mobil/Mobilte...</a>) which clearly shows the BADA logo.<br><br>In case of a copyright issue this could be kind of problematic but I think Samsung will stick to it after the launch of their new platform (<a href="http://www.bada.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bada.com/</a>) in December with all those 2.7M$ in prices to claim. That looks interesting but I guess that Samsung will hold on to BADA after all their publishing on their homepage (http://samsung.de/de/Privatkunden/Mobil/Mobilte…) which clearly shows the BADA logo.

In case of a copyright issue this could be kind of problematic but I think Samsung will stick to it after the launch of their new platform (http://www.bada.com/) in December with all those 2.7M$ in prices to claim.

]]> By: Steve http://www.unwiredview.com/2010/01/21/samsung-files-for-vita-os-trademark-another-mobile-os/comment-page-1/#comment-26247 Steve Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:55:43 +0000 http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=25298#comment-26247 <a href="http://register.dpma.de/DPMAregister/marke/register/1893024/304709166/DE" rel="nofollow">http://register.dpma.de/DPMAregister/marke/regi...</a><br><br>as seen on samsunghub.... http://register.dpma.de/DPMAregister/marke/regi…

as seen on samsunghub….

]]> By: karlheinz_shreiber http://www.unwiredview.com/2010/01/21/samsung-files-for-vita-os-trademark-another-mobile-os/comment-page-1/#comment-24388 karlheinz_shreiber Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:30:18 +0000 http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=25298#comment-24388 That looks interesting but I guess that Samsung will hold on to BADA after all their publishing on their homepage (<a href="http://samsung.de/de/Privatkunden/Mobil/Mobiltelefone/type.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://samsung.de/de/Privatkunden/Mobil/Mobilte...</a>) which clearly shows the BADA logo.<br><br>In case of a copyright issue this could be kind of problematic but I think Samsung will stick to it after the launch of their new platform (<a href="http://www.bada.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bada.com/</a>) in December with all those 2.7M$ in prices to claim. That looks interesting but I guess that Samsung will hold on to BADA after all their publishing on their homepage (http://samsung.de/de/Privatkunden/Mobil/Mobilte…) which clearly shows the BADA logo.

In case of a copyright issue this could be kind of problematic but I think Samsung will stick to it after the launch of their new platform (http://www.bada.com/) in December with all those 2.7M$ in prices to claim.

]]> By: Steve http://www.unwiredview.com/2010/01/21/samsung-files-for-vita-os-trademark-another-mobile-os/comment-page-1/#comment-24387 Steve Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:55:43 +0000 http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=25298#comment-24387 <a href="http://register.dpma.de/DPMAregister/marke/register/1893024/304709166/DE" rel="nofollow">http://register.dpma.de/DPMAregister/marke/regi...</a><br><br>as seen on samsunghub.... http://register.dpma.de/DPMAregister/marke/regi…

as seen on samsunghub….

]]>