<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unwired View &#187; WAT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unwiredview.com/category/wat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unwiredview.com</link>
	<description>Wireless news, views and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:01:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WAT: Why there ain&#8217;t more phones with Android 2.0. And there won&#8217;t be soon, if ever</title>
		<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/11/05/wat-why-all-phones-except-droid-come-with-android-1-6-because-there-is-no-android-2-0-and-there-wont-be-anymore-handsets-with-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/11/05/wat-why-all-phones-except-droid-come-with-android-1-6-because-there-is-no-android-2-0-and-there-wont-be-anymore-handsets-with-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staska</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software&Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Droid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=22641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is another post in my “Wild arsed theories” (WAT) category. It’s a pure speculation, based on the stuff I see happening in mobile industry. And some of these posts will certainly be completely off base. So if you have some corrections, objections, or knowledge that I am wrong, do not hesitate to share them in the comments. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is another post in my <a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/11/03/wat-why-europeans-did-not-get-googles-free-turn-by-turn-navigation-on-motorola-milestone/">“Wild arsed theories” (WAT) category</a>. It’s a  pure speculation, based on the stuff I see happening in mobile industry. And  some of these posts will certainly be completely off base. So if you have some  corrections, objections, or knowledge that I am wrong, do not hesitate to share  them in the comments. </em></p>
<p>What the heck’s happening with this Android stuff? All was peachy with the  Android 1.0, Android 1.1, Android 1.5 Cupcake, and even Android 1.6 Donut  releases.</p>
<p>Google will make OS available, cellphone vendors will take the package and  make cool smartphones with it. Everyone gets the same version and releases  handsets with it, accordingly.</p>
<p>Then came the announcement of Android 2.0 running Verizon/Motorola Droid,  release of Android 2.0 SDK to developers, and things started getting really  confusing.</p>
<p>With much more advanced and visually appealing Android 2.0 available, and  already running on one phone, one would expect other vendors to jump on the  bandwagon, and announce Eclair running handsets as soon as they can.</p>
<p>But no, all others, announcing their Android smartphones, for some mysterious  reason, are using the old 1.6 Donut version of the OS.  Even for the high end  models, that will ship only next year, like <a href="../2009/11/03/sony-ericsson-xperia-x10-now-official-comes-with-android-1-6-new-ux-platform-and-more/" target="_blank">Sony Ericsson Xperia X10</a>, or other <a href="../2009/11/05/verizon-announces-the-htc-droid-eris-launches-the-lg-chocolate-touch/" target="_blank">Verizon Droid series handsets, like HTC Eris</a>.</p>
<p>And I think,  I know what this reason is.</p>
<p>There simply is no 2.0 version of Android operating system yet. At least in a  way, we usually consider a software package to be ready for a version X.0  number.</p>
<p>What we do have as an OS, Google, Motorola and Verizon call Android 2.0 for  marketing purposes, is a pre-release/beta version of the software, optimized to  run on a single device by a single vendor.</p>
<p>If you think it’s unlikely that Google will give one vendor such a strong  preference, to launch a competing device, with a more advanced version of OS,  think again.</p>
<p>This is exactly the same thing Google did last year, when they really wanted  to get their OS into the market, before the year/holiday season was over. Google  worked directly with HTC, optimizing the unfinished operating system to run on a  single handset. Then they called it Android 1.0, and launched HTC G1/Dream  handset running on it. With tons of unfinished/absent features, bugs and all.</p>
<p>Even Andy Rubin himself admitted, that <a href="../2009/06/02/understanding-google-android-past-present-future/" target="_blank">Android 1.0 wasn’t really a software package worthy of 1.0  tag</a>. Android reached that level only with the release of the Cupcake  1.5/Donut 1.6 updates. That’s when all other vendors felt that the software was actually ready for their phones, and got busy releasing them.</p>
<p>The launch of Motorola Droid, is sort of a <em>deja vu</em> of the things  that happened last year.</p>
<p>Close integration work exclusively for a single handset, from a single  vendor. Advanced version of the OS, not available to other vendors. The feeling  of a rushed job, manifesting in illogically unfinished/absent features (see the  dismal multimedia/sync experience, camera issues, universal search limitations,  laginess of basic UI elements, etc;  that <a href="http://go.unwiredview.com.?id=3730X622581&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5395801%2Fandroid-20-review-almost-human&sref=rss" target="_blank">Gizmodo found</a> on Droid).</p>
<p>All are the mirror thing of the problems the original G1 faced in November  2008.</p>
<p>So, to anyone waiting for another Android 2.0 handset to be released anytime  soon, sorry. You won’t be seeing any of them this year. If ever.</p>
<p>My guess is, that Android 2.0 will remain exclusive to Motorola  Droid/Milestone. Just like Android 1.0 was exclusive to HTC Dream/G1.</p>
<p>The rest of us, who will not pick up Droid, will have to wait for the release  of <a href="../2009/11/04/google-hard-at-work-on-android-2-1/" target="_blank">Android 2.1/Flan</a>, to get our hands on the next generation  Android goodness. The handsets with which should be announced in February 2010,  and start shipping sometime in March/April.
<div class="fblike_button" style="margin: 10px 0;"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.unwiredview.com%2F2009%2F11%2F05%2Fwat-why-all-phones-except-droid-come-with-android-1-6-because-there-is-no-android-2-0-and-there-wont-be-anymore-handsets-with-it%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:25px"></iframe></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/11/30/will-htc-hero-skip-android-2-0-upgrade-and-go-directly-to-android-2-1flan/" rel="bookmark" title="November 30, 2009">Will HTC Hero skip Android 2.0 upgrade and go directly to Android 2.1/Flan?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/05/11/samsung-spica-and-bigfoot-android-phone-details-leaked/" rel="bookmark" title="May 11, 2009">Samsung Spica and BigFoot Android 2.0/ Donut phone details leaked</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2010/06/15/motorola-verizon-droid-x-d2-on-june-23-new-blur-android-2-1-9-and-flash-support-inside/" rel="bookmark" title="June 15, 2010">Motorola Verizon Droid X (&#038; D2?) on June 23. New Blur, Android 2.1.9 and Flash support inside?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/11/23/google-maps-navigation-for-android-1-6-released/" rel="bookmark" title="November 23, 2009">Google Maps Navigation for Android 1.6 released</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2010/12/16/samsung-google-nexus-s-musings-why-the-heck-did-google-launch-it/" rel="bookmark" title="December 16, 2010">Samsung Google Nexus S musings. Why the heck did Google even bother to launch it?</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 7.483 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/11/05/wat-why-all-phones-except-droid-come-with-android-1-6-because-there-is-no-android-2-0-and-there-wont-be-anymore-handsets-with-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WAT: Why Europeans did not get Google&#8217;s free turn-by-turn navigation on Motorola Milestone</title>
		<link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/11/03/wat-why-europeans-did-not-get-googles-free-turn-by-turn-navigation-on-motorola-milestone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/11/03/wat-why-europeans-did-not-get-googles-free-turn-by-turn-navigation-on-motorola-milestone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staska</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola Milestone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unwiredview.com/?p=22467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once in a while, after certain events, theories  about the happenings in mobile industry start bouncing around my head. Some of them turn out to be a complete BS, a few happen to be spot on, and quite a few are somewhere in the middle. I’d like to share them to get some input of whether I’m [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once in a while, after certain events, theories  about the happenings in  mobile industry start bouncing around my head.</p>
<p>Some of them turn out to be a complete BS, a few happen to be spot on, and  quite a few are somewhere in the middle. I’d like to share them to get some  input of whether I’m going completely bonkers, or not.</p>
<p>So I’m starting a new category of posts on UV &#8211; “Wild arsed theories” or  WAT – just for this purpose. These will be a pure speculation on my part, based  on some things I see happing in the market.</p>
<p>Today lets start with the Android stuff.  With the <a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/11/02/motorola-milestone-droid-officially-launched-in-europe-gets-multi-touch-looses-free-navigation/">release of Motorola  Milestone in Europe</a>, two questions have been buggering me.</p>
<p>1. Why there&#8217;s no Google&#8217;s  free turn-by-turn navigation app  in a European version of Droid (Motorola Milestone).</p>
<p>2. What’s happening with the frigging Android OS upgrades? First we get  Android 1.6 Donut upgrade. Then, in a few weeks, a phone running Android  2.0/Eclair comes out. However none of the other Android handsets, coming out  this year, mention anything about Android 2.0.  All of them, apparently, are  still running Android 1.6. Even uber high end Sony Ericsson Xperia X10,  announced today, but due only in Q1 2010.</p>
<p>Well, I think, I may have answers to both of these questions. Let’s start with  the first today, and get to second tomorrow.</p>
<h4>Why there is no free turn-by-turn navigation in Motorola Milestone? And it  ain’t comig anytime soon</h4>
<p>It all comes down to the mapping data. Take a look at these screenshots:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://c2499022.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Google-Maps-data-ownership.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-22468 aligncenter" title="Google Maps data ownership" src="http://c2499022.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Google-Maps-data-ownership.jpg" alt="Google Maps data ownership" width="571" height="195" /></a></p>
<p>See the difference? The copyright notice for the area around Kansas City says that map data is owned by Google. The same notice for London says that map  data is owned by Tele Atlas.</p>
<p>And it’s the same all over the world. Play a bit with Google maps yourself.  What you will see is that the map data anywhere in the United States is owned by  Google. Even in remote places like Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico.</p>
<p>Just cross  the border, to Canada or Mexico, and another company name springs up in the map  data ownership field.  TeleAtlas, INEGO, Europa Technologies, etc;</p>
<p>What this tells us is, that, for now, Google has collected enough of it’s own  mapping  data only for the United States. And since they own the data there, they are  free to use it however they like. Including provision of a free turn-by-turn  navigation services, that <a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/10/28/google-intros-free-maps-navigation-for-android-2-0-garmin-and-tomtom-stocks-plummet/">screws the business model</a> for paid nav service and gadget  providers like Garmin and TomTom.</p>
<p>But all the mapping data for Western Europe in Google maps, is provided by  TeleAtlas, owned by Tom Tom. Do you think Tom Tom is eager to provide Google  with the data that could destroy their paid service and the main income source?  I am pretty sure, that somewhere in a contract between Tele Atlas and Google,  there is a clause, explicitly forbidding Google to offer tbt navigation, using  Tele Atlas data.</p>
<p>So now what? Tough luck for us, Europeans? No free navigation from Google  here?</p>
<p>Yes. For now.</p>
<p>But don’t think Google is sitting still and won’t be able to collect all that  European map data for itself. Those Google Street View  cars are not driving  around just for fun.</p>
<p>We know that Google is able to collect it’s own mapping data and they  are heavily investing in it. They already did so in the U.S, after all. And as  soon as Google has enough of it for Western Europe, the navigation services will  come here too.</p>
<p>Thank&#8217;s to <a href="http://go.unwiredview.com.?id=3730X622581&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FOscarB&sref=rss">OScarB</a> and <a href="http://go.unwiredview.com.?id=3730X622581&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fvowe.net%2Farchives%2F010973.html&sref=rss">vowe </a>for pointing me in the right derection
<div class="fblike_button" style="margin: 10px 0;"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.unwiredview.com%2F2009%2F11%2F03%2Fwat-why-europeans-did-not-get-googles-free-turn-by-turn-navigation-on-motorola-milestone%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:25px"></iframe></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/11/02/motorola-milestone-droid-officially-launched-in-europe-gets-multi-touch-looses-free-navigation/" rel="bookmark" title="November 2, 2009">Motorola Milestone (Droid) officially launched in Europe. Gets multi-touch, loses free navigation</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/01/06/apple-patents-iphone-mobile-navigation-mapping-app/" rel="bookmark" title="January 6, 2009">Apple patents iPhone Mobile Navigation / Mapping App</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2010/06/09/motorola-milestone-xt720-to-hit-the-uk-on-july-2/" rel="bookmark" title="June 9, 2010">Motorola Milestone XT720 to hit the UK on July 2</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/11/23/google-maps-navigation-for-android-1-6-released/" rel="bookmark" title="November 23, 2009">Google Maps Navigation for Android 1.6 released</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/06/30/new-google-tele-atlas-deal-will-give-users-improved-maps-chance-to-change-the-world/" rel="bookmark" title="June 30, 2008">New Google-Tele Atlas deal will give users improved maps, chance to change the world</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 6.898 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/11/03/wat-why-europeans-did-not-get-googles-free-turn-by-turn-navigation-on-motorola-milestone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c2499022.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com

Served from: www.unwiredview.com @ 2012-02-14 01:49:22 -->
